<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brainsick Patterns -- No Code Relation &#187; Software Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/category/software-engineering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com</link>
	<description>Umm... a porridge made from things I learn so I can find them easier?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>2 C# Geeks I&#8217;ve actually talked to</title>
		<link>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/05/2-c-geeks-ive-actually-talked-to/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/05/2-c-geeks-ive-actually-talked-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 06:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/05/2-c-geeks-ive-actually-talked-to/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that either would remember of course, I&#8217;m just saying&#8230;
Before my mental breakdown they helped tremendously on a few projects by helping me wrap my feeble mind around a few ideas in the C# Usetnet groups.
Anyway&#8230;
Peter Ritchie
Jon Skeet
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that either would remember of course, I&#8217;m just saying&#8230;</p>
<p>Before my mental breakdown they helped tremendously on a few projects by helping me wrap my feeble mind around a few ideas in the C# Usetnet groups.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/PeterRitchie/">Peter Ritchie</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/jon_skeet/default.aspx">Jon Skeet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/05/2-c-geeks-ive-actually-talked-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I often forget that an idea should start on paper</title>
		<link>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/05/i-often-forget-that-an-idea-should-start-on-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/05/i-often-forget-that-an-idea-should-start-on-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 08:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software QA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/05/i-often-forget-that-an-idea-should-start-on-paper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously, there is simply no comparing typing a bunch of text into an editor as opposed to sketching it out on paper first.
Related Links:
Good testing starts with a good strategy
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, there is simply no comparing typing a bunch of text into an editor as opposed to sketching it out on paper first.</p>
<p>Related Links:</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://panamo.wordpress.com/2008/12/05/good-testing-starts-with-a-good-strategy/">Good testing starts with a good strategy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/05/i-often-forget-that-an-idea-should-start-on-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self-Generating Code</title>
		<link>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/self-generating-code/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/self-generating-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/self-generating-code/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t call this one a gem for a couple reasons.

It&#8217;s really stupid to do this — especially compared against other more modern and secure techniques.
I don&#8217;t use C/C++ at the moment.
The code is ugly.&#160; Most C++ is though.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t call <a target="_blank" href="http://www.codeproject.com/KB/tips/Self-generating-code.aspx">this one</a> a gem for a couple reasons.</p>
<ol>
<li>It&#8217;s really stupid to do this — especially compared against other more modern and secure techniques.</li>
<li>I don&#8217;t use C/C++ at the moment.</li>
<li>The code is ugly.&nbsp; Most C++ is though.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/self-generating-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Gem from The Code Project &#8211; A flexible charting library for .NET</title>
		<link>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/another-gem-from-the-code-project-a-flexible-charting-library-for-net/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/another-gem-from-the-code-project-a-flexible-charting-library-for-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/another-gem-from-the-code-project-a-flexible-charting-library-for-net/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A flexible charting library for .NET
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.codeproject.com/KB/graphics/zedgraph.aspx">A flexible charting library for .NET</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/another-gem-from-the-code-project-a-flexible-charting-library-for-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Put dependencies under source control</title>
		<link>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/put-dependencies-under-source-control/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/put-dependencies-under-source-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debugging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Tip!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/put-dependencies-under-source-control/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another Stack Overflow gem in &#8220;How to use Office from Visual Studio C#?&#8220;&#160; The question was exhausting but one of those who responded had some sagely advice:
The answer is to &#8220;Copy Local&#8221; whatever assembly dll you get for the interop. Once you have the assembly dll in your output folder, add a reference to it, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Stack Overflow gem in &#8220;<a target="_blank" href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/401637/how-to-use-office-from-visual-studio-c">How to use Office from Visual Studio C#?</a>&#8220;&nbsp; The question was exhausting but one of those who responded had some sagely advice:</p>
<blockquote><p>The answer is to &#8220;Copy Local&#8221; whatever assembly dll you get for the interop. Once you have the assembly dll in your output folder, add a reference to it, and check it into source control.</p>
<p>Now everyone has the referenced assembly dll.</p>
<p>—anonymousstackoverflow</p></blockquote>
<p>Now I&#8217;m sure to some that may sound like kindergarten learning but it never dawned on me to put external dependencies under source control.</p>
<p>In this fashion a set of legacy developers can maintain legacy code while emerging standards developers can maintain the latest emergent standard — both separated from the other one&#8217;s development.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a light bulb and it&#8217;s warm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/put-dependencies-under-source-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great tips about Structuring Solutions in Visual Studio</title>
		<link>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/great-tips-about-structuring-solutions-in-visual-studio/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/great-tips-about-structuring-solutions-in-visual-studio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/great-tips-about-structuring-solutions-in-visual-studio/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The Elder&#8221; is apparently a freaking genius.&#160; Tip #2 changed my life although apparently I was already doing this.
I freaked out at first — I thought I was guilty of it.  Rather, in the IDE I use for PHP code I group similar projects in same name spaces or work spaces.  I got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.keithelder.net/blog/archive/2007/02/01/Structuring-Solutions-in-Visual-Studio-and-Team-Foundation.aspx">The Elder</a>&#8221; is apparently a freaking genius.&nbsp; Tip #2 changed my life although apparently I was already doing this.</p>
<p>I freaked out at first — I thought I was guilty of it.  Rather, in the IDE I use for PHP code I group similar projects in same name spaces or work spaces.  I got to thinking though, and I NEVER plan to develop any PHP for deployment into executable bytecode or encoded somehow.  So grouping projects under one general solution label is fine.</p>
<p>Brainsick Solutions for example is a namespace in most of my C# and PHP code.  That&#8217;s where:
<ul>
<li>blog.* WordPress widgets and blog development takes place.</li>
<li>portfolio.* modifications to the portfolio gallery and development of separate galleries.</li>
<li>&#8230;several more app.*s in development.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.brainsicksolutions.com/2009/02/great-tips-about-structuring-solutions-in-visual-studio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
